{"id":1534,"date":"2017-11-23T10:28:06","date_gmt":"2017-11-23T15:28:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/crmcspl-blog.recherche.usherbrooke.ca\/?p=1534"},"modified":"2017-11-23T10:28:06","modified_gmt":"2017-11-23T15:28:06","slug":"a-portrayal-of-the-patient-reported-outcomes-used-in-multimorbidity-intervention-research","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/crmcspl-blog.recherche.usherbrooke.ca\/?p=1534","title":{"rendered":"A portrayal of the patient-reported outcomes used in multimorbidity intervention research"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a class=\"twitter-share-button\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/share\">Tweet<\/a> <script type=\"text\/javascript\">\/\/ <![CDATA[\n   !function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=\/^http:\/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+':\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs');\n\/\/ ]]><\/script><\/p>\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\">By Maxime Sasseville<\/div>\n<div><a href=\"https:\/\/crmcspl-blog.recherche.usherbrooke.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/Maxime-S-2.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1535\" title=\"Maxime S 2\" src=\"https:\/\/crmcspl-blog.recherche.usherbrooke.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/Maxime-S-2.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"182\" height=\"244\" \/><\/a><\/div>\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\">Heterogeneity in outcome measures used in multimorbidity intervention research currently leads to a lack of consistent evidence to support clinical implementation. Understanding the current state of patient-reported outcome assessment is an important endeavor for multimorbidity research and policy-making, as its use contributes to a patient-centered approach.<\/div>\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\">This scoping review [1] aimed to describe patient-reported outcomes in the context of chronic disease management interventions for people with multimorbidity. Specifically, the objectives of the review were 1) to portray the current use of patient-reported outcomes in multimorbidity interventions; and 2) to propose a descriptive classification system according to the different types of outcomes identified.<\/div>\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\">Twenty-two studies were identified from which 56 outcomes measures were reported. The measures were grouped into 18 categories and six emergent domains of outcomes: General health, Psychosocial, Disease management, Health-related behaviours, Functional and Health services. Quality of life, health-related behaviors and self-efficacy were the most reported outcome categories, while patient satisfaction, communication with providers and adverse outcomes were rarely reported.<\/div>\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\">The organization proposed in this paper could contribute to improving outcome selection for research, clinical care and policy and lead to the creation of adapted patient-related outcome measures. Consistent design of outcome assessment between multimorbidity intervention study could lead to a more coherent body of evidence for clinical implementation.<\/div>\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\">The article can be freely accessed until December 15 2017 by following this link:<\/div>\n<div><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0020748917302237\"> https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0020748917302237<\/a><\/div>\n<div>.<\/div>\n<div id=\"_mcePaste\">[1] Sasseville, M., Chouinard, M. C., &amp; Fortin, M. (2017). Patient-reported outcomes in multimorbidity intervention research: A scoping review. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 77 145-153<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tweet By Maxime Sasseville Heterogeneity in outcome measures used in multimorbidity intervention research currently leads to a lack of consistent evidence to support clinical implementation. Understanding the current state of patient-reported outcome assessment is an important endeavor for multimorbidity research and policy-making, as its use contributes to a patient-centered approach. This scoping review [1] aimed <a href=\"https:\/\/crmcspl-blog.recherche.usherbrooke.ca\/?p=1534\"> read more <span class=\"meta-nav\">&raquo;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":66,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1534","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-others"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/crmcspl-blog.recherche.usherbrooke.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1534","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/crmcspl-blog.recherche.usherbrooke.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/crmcspl-blog.recherche.usherbrooke.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crmcspl-blog.recherche.usherbrooke.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/66"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crmcspl-blog.recherche.usherbrooke.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1534"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/crmcspl-blog.recherche.usherbrooke.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1534\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1539,"href":"https:\/\/crmcspl-blog.recherche.usherbrooke.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1534\/revisions\/1539"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/crmcspl-blog.recherche.usherbrooke.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1534"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crmcspl-blog.recherche.usherbrooke.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1534"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crmcspl-blog.recherche.usherbrooke.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1534"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}